# Inertial frame of reference

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]

This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

In physics, an inertial frame of reference is a frame of reference in which the laws of physics take on their simplest form. In Newtonian mechanics, and in special relativity, an inertial frame of reference is one in uniform translation with respect to the "fixed stars" (an historical reference taken today as actually designating the universe as a whole), so far as present observations can determine. In general relativity an inertial frame of reference applies only in a limited region of space small enough that the curvature of space due to the energy and mass within it is negligible.

## Simplest form of physical law

One could argue that "simplest" is a description that meant the Earth-centered universe at one time, so exactly what is simplest is subject to some evolution in meaning.

Today, the primary simplification of physical laws found in inertial frames is the absence of any need to introduce inertial forces, forces that originate in the acceleration of a noninertial frame. Such inertial forces can be identified by their lack of originating sources like charges or other fundamental particles, and their unusual dependence upon the observer's state of motion. In particular, these forces simply disappear when the phenomena are described from the viewpoint of an inertial frame; hence the simplification introduced by inertial frames.

According to the first postulate of special relativity, all physical laws take their simplest form in an inertial frame, and there exist multiple inertial frames interrelated by uniform translation:[1]

 “ Special principle of relativity: If a system of coordinates K is chosen so that, in relation to it, physical laws hold good in their simplest form, the same laws hold good in relation to any other system of coordinates K' moving in uniform translation relatively to K. ” —Albert Einstein: The foundation of the general theory of relativity, Section A, § 1

The two points emphasized here are (i) simplicity of the laws and (ii) the same form for the laws when transformed between inertial frames.

## Historical remarks

Historically, philosophers such as Descartes and Bishop Berkeley took the very reasonable view that in a universe with only one body in it, it would be impossible to tell if a body were moving at all. They suggested that it was the relative motions of bodies that mattered, as more than one body was needed just to provide a reference point. Unfortunately, it is not possible to experience a universe containing only one body, so this logically appealing viewpoint cannot be tested. Because the universe contains many bodies, a version of this proposal due to Ernst Mach was that curved motion was curved relative to the fixed stars. The "fixed stars" were a simplified reference to the universe as a whole. Today, the notion is that the laws of physics should be observed in an inertial frame of reference, which is to say, in one of a privileged set of frames that move uniformly with respect to each other, and in which the laws take on their "simplest" form. To quote Nagel:[2]

 ‘ Accordingly, the primary objective of using inertial frames, whether they are actually realized in physical systems or are only ideal constructions, is to effect a simplification in the formulation of laws. It is a happy circumstance that there are in fact physical systems which are at least approximate realizations of inertial frames. ’ —Ernest Nagel, The Structure of Science

To within experimental errors of observation, a reference frame attached to the universe is one of these inertial frames.[3] It may be noted, however, that the general theory of relativity does away with inertial frames on a grand scale, and reserves them for only local observations. On cosmological scales, the distribution of mass and energy itself determines the geometry of space-time, and any distinction between accelerating and inertial frames of reference is moot. The background for physical events is a dynamical structure dependent upon the mass and energy within it.[4]

## Galilean frames of reference

In Newtonian physics, the idea of absolute time is introduced, which is the same for all observers. Inertial frames translate relative to one another, but share the same time. For example, they agree upon the simultaneity of two events. To contrast this situation with special relativity, this treatment is sometimes called the "3+1 absolute splitting of time". The laws of mechanics take the same form in inertial frames, specifically, Newton's laws of motion are the same for all observers. This behavior is referred to as Galilean invariance, and mathematically means that Newton's laws are not changed if the positions of all objects in space, say {rj (t)}, all are replaced by the positions seen in a translating frame moving with steady velocity v, namely {rj (t)−v t}. In particular, the famous second law F=m a is preserved:

${\displaystyle \mathbf {F} =m{\frac {d^{2}}{dt^{2}}}\left(\mathbf {r_{j}} (t)-\mathbf {v} t\right)=m{\frac {d^{2}}{dt^{2}}}\mathbf {r_{j}} (t)\ .}$

In summary, within Newtonian mechanics, inertial frames are those related by Galilean transformations.[5]

## Lorentz frames of reference

In special relativity, the idea of absolute time is dropped. If we are to agree that all the laws of physics must apply in all inertial frames, Maxwell's equations of electromagnetism must appear the same in all inertial frames, not just the laws of mechanics. Moreover, the speed of light is postulated to be the same. The changes in coordinates that leave these equations unchanged are not those of Galilean transformations but those of the Lorentz transformation. In particular, the forces between charged particles depend upon their velocities, so Galilean invariance will not work. Both space and time must be transformed, and observers in uniform, straight-line relative motion might not agree whether two events are simultaneous. In one dimension, for two inertial frames in uniform translation in (say) the x-direction, with their x-axes lined up (primes distinguish one frame from the other):

${\displaystyle x'={\frac {x-vt}{\sqrt {1-v^{2}/c^{2}}}}\ ,}$
${\displaystyle t'={\frac {t-vx/c^{2}}{\sqrt {1-v^{2}/c^{2}}}}\ .}$

The coordinates y and z are unaffected. Here c is the physical speed of light in ideal vacuum, and v is the speed of one frame relative to the other. Laws that do not change under such transformations are called Lorentz invariant. A generalization of the Lorentz transformation that includes an arbitrary displacement of the space and time origins is called a Poincaré transformation.

In summary, within special relativity, inertial frames are those related by Lorentz transformations.

## Notes

1. Einstein, A., Lorentz, H. A., Minkowski, H., & Weyl, H. (1952). The Principle of Relativity: a collection of original memoirs on the special and general theory of relativity. Courier Dover Publications. ISBN 0486600815.
2. Ernest Nagel (1979). The structure of science: problems in the logic of scientific explanation, 2nd ed. Hackett Publishing, p. 212. ISBN 0915144719.
3. A major source of information on the motion of the universe is the study of the cosmic background radiation related to the big bang origin of the universe. See for example, R. B. Partridge (1995). “§8.1 Sources of anisotropy in the CBR”, 3K: the cosmic microwave background radiation. Cambridge University Press, pp. 279 ff. ISBN 0521352541.
4. Robert Disalle (2006). Understanding space-time: the philosophical development of physics from Newton to Einstein. Cambridge University Press, pp. 15-16. ISBN 0521857902.
5. For example, see William S. C. Williams (2002). “§5.3 Galilean transformations”, Introducing special relativity. CRC Press, pp. 70 ff. ISBN 0415277620.